Eugene Maguin, Research Professor Thomas Nochajski and co-authors publish article "Examining the validity of the adapted Alabama Parenting Questionnaire Parent Global Report Version"

Published October 13, 2015 This content is archived.

Eugene Maguin

Eugene Maguin.
Print

Thomas Nochajski

Thomas Nochajski.

Congratulations to Eugene Maguin, Research Professor Thomas Nochajski and co-authors on the publication of their article "Examining the validity of the adapted Alabama Parenting Questionnaire Parent Global Report Version," in Psychological Assessment.

Maguin, E., Nochajski, T., Dewit, D., & Safyer, A. (2015). Examining the validity of the adapted Alabama Parenting Questionnaire Parent Global Report Version. Psychological Assessment.

Abstract:

The purpose of the present study was to comprehensively examine the validity of an adapted version of the parent global report form of the AlabamaParenting Questionnaire (APQ) with respect to its factor structure, relationships with demographic and response style covariates, and differential item functioning (DIF). The APQ was adapted by omitting the corporal punishment and the other discipline items. The sample consisted of 674 Canadian and United States families having a 9- to 12-year-old child and at least 1 parent figure who had received treatment within the past 5 years for alcohol problems or met criteria for alcohol abuse or dependence. The primary parent in each family completed the APQ. The 4-factor CFA model of the 4 published scales used and the 3-factor CFA model of those scales from prior research were rejected. Exploratory structural equation modeling was then used. The final 3-factor model combined the author-defined Involvement and Positive Parenting scales and retained the original Poor Monitoring/Supervision and Inconsistent Discipline scales. However, there were substantial numbers of moderate magnitude cross-loadings and large magnitude residual covariances. Differential item functioning (DIF) was observed for a number of APQ items. Controlling for DIF, response style and demographic variables were related significantly to the factors.